o you ever feel frustrated and powerless
over the escalating world problems?
I receive a lot of emails from people
who have read my website and others as
well and now feel they have a grasp of
what is going on in the world, but they
feel hopeless, helpless and sometimes
fearful. Even when I refer them to my
spiritual section and even when they
like my spiritual ideas, they still want
to do something 'more direct' as well.
I know one thing EVERYONE can do, which
is extremely helpful. Help me research!
I have decided I want my website to be a
pilot for this idea. Personally, I am so
tired of people who are doing hardcore
research (top shot 'conspiracy'
researchers), sitting in their ivory
tower and research 'in secret' and don't
let anybody in until the research on a
certain topic is over. Then they either
put the result on a website or in a
book. People read it and get
enlightened, but they feel they're not
'part of it'; they are just the
receivers of information. Some may even
think they have some ideas to add to
what they read, but never get a chance,
unless they create a website of their
own, which is not always an option. Of
course, people can go out and spread the
word to their neighbors and friends, but
I often hear that some of those who try
are not always very successful,
because their environment is still
asleep and doesn't want to be awakened.
This is quite common. Therefore, a
better way for people who have
encountered this problem would be to
share information with already
established researchers, who have a
website with a decent amount of
visitors, like myself.
It's nothing wrong with doing ones own
research like most 'hot researchers' do, but if an 'outside
researcher' comes up with an idea and
tells the famous, 'top researcher' about
the idea, he either doesn't get a reply,
his information is used as if the famous researcher had found it out
him/herself, or you get an email back
criticizing your idea and it's then rejected
without much further consideration. On
occasion, they may even be arrogant
Sometimes it may be
justified to criticize and reject, but in my own case I've
noticed too many times that later on the
idea I presented actually had value and
someone else eventually 'steals' the
idea. I never make a big deal about that
on a personal level, because it's not
about me, but about the information in
itself. The number one importance is
that the info gets out there; more
important than who came up with it. My
problem with it is the ego part, though,
which can rapidly escalate and the
researcher will be wide open to accept
disinformation, unwittingly so, because
the (dis)information is 'new' and hasn't
been presented before. It makes him/her
vulnerable and the researcher can then
be easily discredited by the same
sources who gave the disinformation. The
ego part is something we all have to
work on, and it's VERY important that we
What I've noticed is that ego is big in this field
(and again, this does not apply to
everybody). It's almost like a
fraternity of its own, where the famous
ones scratch each others back and link
each other up back and forth. You're
either in the club or you're not. Those
who are not in the club are rarely paid
attention to and have to work very hard
to get their word out on their own,
because they don't get much help from
those they expect to support them.
I am not saying this to criticize or
attack anybody in particular; it's a
human thing, but it's dangerous when you
research for the truth. And at any time
in your research, you have to be able to
say to yourself "I was wrong" and start
all over if necessary. Don't hold on to
old ideas that are shown not to work
just because you once presented them, is
my motto. Show you're human and make
mistakes. Most people are okay with
that, as long as you admit to them in
public and start all over. Sometimes I
get an email with an upset person,
pointing out something from an article
that he/she knows is incorrect and then
goes on raging about "do your research,
dude!" This reaction may be justified to
some degree, because there are
researchers out there who refuse to
admit they were wrong and it's
frustrating for people who know the
researcher actually was incorrect.
Therefore, the person already has a
preconception of me being the same way.
He/she feels a need to point out the
error, but doesn't expect me to do
anything about it - thus the rage.
I believe that if you show you're honest
even when you're wrong, people will
start trusting you.
I want people to feel they participate
in spreading the truth! I have the
website with all these visitors, but you
who are reading from it may have information I
don't know about, which I can use on
this forum. If you do, be my
co-researcher and send me stuff you
think is of importance. And please don't
sit on it and doubt if you should send
it or not, thinking I may laugh it off
as stupid. I want to know what you have,
whether I can use it or not. There is no
"stupid information", just information.
I want to look at it, whatever it is,
and make up my own mind about it. And if
I post it, I am happy to include your
name as a co-researcher, or you can be
anonymous, knowing that I NEVER reveal
my sources, unless the source allows me
to do so in writing.
So how should we do this the easiest
I would like you, when you read an
article on my site, to think about if
you have some additional information to
what's in the article, and if so, send
it to me, even if it's just bits and
pieces or a single sentence. It can be
important! Or, you have information that
debunks an article? Wonderful! Send it!
Do you have a topic in mind that you
can't seem to find on my website, but
think would fit in? Email me and ask me
if I am interested in that topic (before
you start researching it or writing
about it, if the purpose is to post it
on MY site. This saves you time, in case
I say I'm not interested). If I say yes,
feel free to write an article or
research the topic and send the result
to me. Never feel intimidated! I never
intimidate people - I encourage people.
Sometimes, like I did recently with the
Who is Supriem
I started out with very little knowledge
about this man and posted the article
for everybody to read, although it was
far from finished. Then I let people
email me with information they had on
the subject and I updated the article
like a blog, with the today's date
exposing the latest news on the subject,
then I added new updates as soon as new
info came in and so on. This showed to be very
successful, and I could also concentrate
on other research on the side, while you, the
readers, gave me valuable info on
Supriem Rockefeller. This is a format I
may use on occasion as well, because it
takes a huge burden off of me.
But what about disinformation? Isn't
this way of researching opening up doors
for disinformation agents? Sure it does,
but that door is always open anyway, and
we just have to try and connect the
dots, as always. Nothing is different.
Another reason I want to try out this
pilot is because I don't belong to a
research group. I am entirely on my own,
so to speak. I have a family and I have
a full-time job on top of researching
this stuff. I get up very early in the
morning to have peace and quite to
research, and I never get sufficient
sleep. Even with these morning hours, understandably, there is
only so much I can do, but so much I
would LIKE to be able to do. This is
where you come in! If we all together
help creating a great Illuminati News
website that will enlighten people all
over the world, we all feel we did
something about this situation. We
If you are interested in this and have
some information to share, don't
hesitate to contact me. Don't be
discouraged if it takes a few days
sometimes for me to reply. As you can
imagine, I am drowning in emails. Also,
don't be discouraged if I happen to say
I can't use your material for some
reason. Please don't give up - next time
you may have just the info I'm looking
Thanks my friends,
Want your opinion to be heard?
Make a comment
have it posted here, uncensored and unedited!
as long as it's written in a civilized manner.
Write me an email
and put the same title in
your email subject line as the name of the article you want
to comment on. You can be anonymous if you like,
or write under a pseudonym. Wes Penre.
The word Illuminati means 1.
People claiming to be unusually
enlightened with regard to a subject. 2.
Illuminati: Any of various groups
claiming special religious
enlightenment. Latin illmint,
from pl. of illmintus,
past participle of illminre,
to light up. See
These definitions are taken from "The
American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language".
definitions say, any group which considers itself "enlightened"
could rightfully call itself the Illuminati. So is also the case. If
you google "The Illuminati", you will find quite a few groups
claiming this name.
It can be confusing, so before we continue, I
want to make very clear that the Illuminati we are discussing here
is NOT a benevolent secret society who wants to create peace and
harmony in this world by helping to bring freedom to the
people. Such a benevolent group DOES exist and happens to call
themselves "The Illuminati", and is actually the original
group using this name.
They have been working behind
the scenes for a very long time to help humanity free themselves
from the chains we have been stuck in for thousands of years.
Unfortunately, the Powers That Be, the evil puppet masters running
this show on war and destruction, infiltrated the truth movement
already in an early stage by adopting the term Illuminati to
describe themselves, thus using the same name as the original
benevolent group. This to further confuse the matter.
Now, almost all researchers
(including myself) have adopted the term "Illuminati" to describe
the Dark Side, and by doing so, we have to a certain degree
unwittingly helped discrediting the benevolent group with this
original name and made it harder for them to get the job done.
Therefore, I will let this
definition follow each and every article posted on this website from
now on in an effort to try to clear up the confusion. I apologize
that so many people now have mixed up the groups, and I have partly,
but ignorant to this fact until recently, been responsible for that.
The point is that the Illuminati I am
exposing here is the super-rich Power Elite with an ambition to
maintain the slave society they have been working so hard to
accomplish over the millennia!
term "New World Order", just like the term "Illuminati", has been
used by at least two different groups, meaning basically two
1) A goal to put an end to the current Order (called "The
Old World Order" - OWO),
which is considered evil and anti-survival, and therefore the
current power elite needs to be overthrown and their Old World Order
to be destroyed and replaced with a benevolent "New World Order".
The goal is a humanity-friendly One World Government. The
means putting an end to the current Old World Order with violence, if
Personally, I don't agree with using violence to stop the Old World
Order, as I am more into a spiritual solution (see elsewhere on my
website), but I want to make my
readers aware of that there IS a group calling themselves "The
Illuminati", who want to replace the current Old World Order (the
Rothschilds, Rockefellers etc.) with a benevolent New World Order,
where people are no longer slaves to this Power Elite.
2) A goal to create a micro-chipped society, so that they more
easily can maintain the current Order that they have created
throughout the millennia. This is the
"New World Order" the Bush's, the Rockefellers, the Rothschilds,
Gordon Brown, Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski and others are
supporting and working on maintaining. This is also the "New World Order"
I am fighting against via this website.
Just like in the case with the term "Illuminati", this second group
has confused researchers and truth seekers by using the basically
benevolent term "New World Order" for their negative and malevolent
goals. This has made it harder for the Resistance to operate,
because both "The Illuminati" and the "New World Order" have been
used as a propaganda for the Dark Side and everything connected to
these two terms now are perceived as negative.
If we really look at it, it's nothing
"new" with what this Power Elite officially calls the "New World Order",
more than an effort to hold on to the Old World Order they have
I hope this to some degree makes things clearer.