Prisoners Getting Neural Implants?
- from Charles L. Kyte, III -
(Posted here by Wes Penre for Illuminati News, April 6, 2004)

Charles L. Kyte, III
The Mount Sinai School of Medicine
One Gustave Levy Place, Box 1124
New York, NY 10029
(212) 241-9386


A Security Division of IBM
1200 Progress Way
Armonk, New York 11204



The control of crime will be a paramount concern in the 21st Century. We must be ready with our security products when the demand for them becomes popular. Our Research and Development Division has been in contact with the Federal Bureau of Prisons, the California Department of Corrections, the Texas Department of Public Safety, and the Massachusetts Department of Correction to run limited trials of the 2020 neural chip implant. We have established representatives of our interests in both management and institutional level positions within these departments.

Federal regulations do not yet permit testing of implants on prisoners, but we have entered into contractual testing of our products. We have also had major successes in privately owned sanitariums with implant technology. We need, however, to expand our testing to research how effective the 2020 neural chip implant performs in those identified as the most aggressive in our society.
Limited testing has produced a number of results.

In California, several prisoners were identified as members of the security threat group, EME, or Mexican Mafia. They were brought to the health services unit at Pelican Bay and tranquilized with advanced sedatives developed by our Cambridge, Massachusetts laboratories. The implants procedure takes 60-90 minutes depending upon the experience of the technician. We are working on a device which will reduce that time by as much as 60%. The implants on 8 prisoners yielded the following results:

- Implants served as surveillance monitoring device for threat
group activity.

- Implants disabled two subjects during an assault on
correctional staff.

- Universal side effects in all 8 test subjects revealed that when
the implant was set to 116 MHz all subjects became lethargic
and slept on an average of 18-22 hours per day.

- All subjects refused recreation periods for 14 days during the
116 MHz test evaluation.

- 7 of the 8 subjects did not exercise, in the cell or out of the
and 5 of the 8 subjects refused showers up to three days at

- Each subjects was monitored for aggressive activity during the
test period and the findings are conclusive that 7 out of the 8
test subjects exhibited no aggression, even when provoked.

- Each subject experienced only minor bleeding from the nose
and ears 48 hours after the implant due to initial adjustment.

- Each subject had no knowledge of the implant for the test
period and each implant was retrieved under the guise of
medical treatment.

It should be noted that the test period was for less than two months. However, during that period substantial data was gathered by our research and development team which suggests that the implants exceed expected results. One of the major concerns of Security and the R & D team was that the test subject would discover the chemical imbalance during the initial adjustment period and the test would have to be scrubbed. However, due to advanced technological developments in the sedatives administered, the 48 hour adjustment period can be attributed to prescription medication given to the test subjects after the implant procedure.

One of the concerns raised by R & D was the cause of the bleeding and how to eliminate that problem. Unexplained bleeding might cause the subject to inquire further about his "routine" visit to the infirmary or other health care facility.

The security windfall from the brief test period was enormous. Security officials now know several strategies employed by the EME that facilitate the transmission of illegal drugs and weapons into their correctional facilities. One intelligence officer remarked that while they cannot use the information they have in a court of law that they know who to watch and what outside "connections" they have. The prison at Soledad is now considering transferring three subjects to Vacaville where we have ongoing implant research. Our technicians have promised that they can do three 2020 neural chip implants in less than an hour. Soledad officials hope to collect information from the trio to bring a 14 month investigation into drug trafficking by correctional officers to a close.

Essentially the implants make the unsuspecting prisoner a walking talking recorder of every event he comes into contact with. There are only five intelligence officers at the Commissioner of Corrections who actually know the full scope of the implant testing.

In Massachusetts, the Department of Correction has already entered into high level discussions about releasing certain offenders to the community with the 2020 neural chip implants.

This is as much information that I have received on this topic so far. I am awaiting more and will report when I get it.

Bobby Castillo,
American Indian Movement

Prison Activist Resource Center / PeaceNet Prison Issues Desk \ PO Box 3201 Berkeley CA 94703 - ph:510/845.8813 fx:845.8816 /
<> / <> \

Dear prisonact-list subscribers (and others),

A few days ago we posted a message of an UNCONFIRMED report about prisoners being subjected to neural implants. we did so just to see if there were any folks who could confirm the report. since posting, we spoke with the original posters. here's what some list subscribers responded, and following that is what Bobby Castillo had to say about it by phone day before yesterday.

Has ANYONE been in touch with AIM and others about the authenticity and veracity of the purported IBM memo on 2020 chip implants in prisoners. If it is true, action should be taken immediately; if it is false, the rumor must be stopped immediately.

G Barrenador
Baltimore ABC

From: Arnold Erickson <>:

>Federal regulations do not yet permit testing of implants on prisoners,
>but we have entered into contractual testing of our products.

Neither does California law. Although I do not have any great love for either the Department of Corrections or IBM, it is hardly likely that the two have entered into contractual testing.

>In California, several prisoners were identified as members of the
>security threat group, EME, or Mexican Mafia. They were brought to the
>health services unit at Pelican Bay and tranquilized with advanced
>sedatives developed by our Cambridge, Massachusetts laboratories.

Given the fact that the medical department at Pelican Bay has been under intense scrutiny by the federal court and the court monitor -- to the extent that the court discovered a doctor was doing personal business rather than treating patients -- this is even less likely.

The second thing I have noticed about the alleged confidential memo is that the zip code for Amronk New York is wrong. Amronk is 10504. The
11204 number appears to be in Brooklyn. You would think IBM would know their correct zipcode if the memo were real.

AND HERE'S ARNOLD'S ROUND-UP ON THIS ISSUE (thanks Arnold, for your perserverance)...

A message was distributed that purported to be a confidential memo from IBM dealing with a "2020 neural chip implant" that was placed in prisoners at Pelican Bay State Prison. This memo is inconsistent and inaccurate in several respects.

1. It states that federal regulations do not permit testing implants on prisoners, but they have entered into contractual testing with other agencies. The California Department of Corrections is identified as one of those agencies. Such tests would violate California law. I doubt if either the Department of Corrections or IBM would enter into such a contract.

2. The memo states that experiments were done at Pelican Bay. Of all the prisons, this is the least likely to be used for secret experiments. The medical department has been under intense court scrutiny. It is unlikely that a secret experiment would remain hidden.

3. The memo identifies an IBM security division at Amronk, New York. It lists a zip code of 11204. This is a Brooklyn zip code. Amronk's code is 10504.

4. The memo identifies intelligence officers at the commission of corrections in California. California does not have a commissioner. A high level memo would be accurate in this respect.

I also doubt that such a memo would refer to "Vacaville" rather than the California Medical Facility.

In short, the memo is inaccurate, inconsistent. I find it unbelievable.

Arnold Erickson

Bobby Castillo of AIM reports (via phone Fri 8 April) that he got the report from an organization in Colorado Springs called N.A.T.I.V.E.S. as well as Doret Kollerer of North Coast Xpress. A message came with it at the time that it may be bogus and should be checked out. Nuerologists that he has spoken to have expressed similar opinions. He may now (Tuesday) have more information. Bobby can be reached at: 415-386-4373.

Of course the questions now are:

1. If the report is exagerated, what's the truth?
2. If it's bogus, who originated it?

Stay tuned,
eli for the Prison Issues Desk

Prison Activist Resource Center / PeaceNet Prison Issues Desk \ PO Box 3201 Berkeley CA 94703 - ph:510/845.8813 fx:845.8816 /
<> / <> \
For progressive & radical info on prison issues, send e-mail \
to <> for details on many resources. /
SEE OUR GOPHER -->, choose #3, then #14 /

Updated/Revised: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 06:07:46 -0700



|| Home | Current Updates | The U.S. Constitution | The Shadow Government a.k.a. the Illuminati | Secret Societies | The New World Order | Occultism | Banking & Paper Money | Politics | Business | Technology | Media Control | Government & Mind Control | Microchipping | Drugs | Nazism Today & In The Past | The War on Terrorism | Religions & Religious Wars | Wars Towards a New World Order | U.S. Patents to Control Us | Surveillance | Health | Miscellaneous | Articles by Wes Penre | E-Books for Free | Links to Other WebsitesCopyright Fair Use | Resources & Bibliography |Site Search | E-Mail Us ||