Dr. Henry Makow
Magazine and The Washington Post ran almost balanced and
sympathetic stories about "the 9-11 Truth Movement."
These publications define reality for millions of unsuspecting
Americans. Why would they legitimize a conspiracy view
that implicates their owners, the Illuminati central bankers? Why
would they publicize discrepancies that they have been covering up
for five years?
Imagine you're in a meeting with the central bankers who control the
American mass media and government. You're the successor of PR whiz
they say, "the matrix is starting to unravel. A third of
Americans believe their government was responsible for 9-11.
Damn the Internet! What are we going to do?"
If I were Bernays, I would reply: "Depends if you're planning
another false flag terrorist event, martial law and an attack on
Iran. If so, I would continue to ignore and marginalize this
movement. You don’t want to give them a huge boost in
credibility at this time."
"Eddie," they reply, "it's too late for all that nasty stuff.
Nobody that matters believes in the terror threat any more.
Israel got a bloody nose in Lebanon and can't attack Iran. The
military has its hands full in Iraq. The generals are in revolt.
Plus the Internet is full of stories blaming the Mossad and
Israel. Anti Semitism is on the rise. "
"Don't panic boys," I tell them. "I have the answer. What we
need is a "Time-Out" to restore everybody's faith in the system.
We need a return to the Democratic Party, a return to the sanity
of the Carter or Clinton eras, a break from those mean ugly
"How do we do that?" the bankers ask.
Ellsberg and The Pentagon Papers. Think
and "Farhenheit 911" We need to shift responsibility for
9-11 onto Dubya's shoulders and away from Silverstein and the
Mossad, the neo-cons and us. We need to reposition the 9-11 Truth-ers
in the mold of the 1960's anti-war movement and focus everyone on
hating the 'government.' Then we'll elect Democrats in November and
[New Mexico Governor]Bill Richardson, or someone like him, in 2008.
It will be a time of renewal, a kinder gentler fascism. We'll have
time to plan the next step."
"Where do we begin?"
"Why not do a TIME cover story on those kids that made the Internet
movie "Loose Change"? They don’t mention the dancing
laughing Mossad agents with explosives in their van who were
arrested 'documenting the event' , do they?
Portray the kids as participating in the "great American
tradition of self reliance and non conformist anti authoritarian
dissent. They're fighting the power." [exact words TIME uses] Maybe
we could bring Bob Dylan in on this."
"Eddie, this is dangerous. That film shows that
Larry [Silverstein] ordered the demolition
of WTC 7 the same day. Are Americans so stupid as to believe that
this 47-storey building was wired for demolition, and WTC–1 and
WTC-2 weren't? Surely they'll figure out that all three were
demolished and a plane was supposed to hit WTC-7. We'll all be hung
for mass murder."
"Guys. Don’t worry. The people believe what they're told not what
their own eyes or common sense tells them. We won’t mention WTC-7 in
the article. We'll just focus on a couple of points and have our
paid flunkies, I mean 'experts' refute them. It'll be our experts
and against theirs and the people will be confused. They'll blame
Dubya and think the media is objective and doing its job."
"Is one story
"Put another one in The Washington Post focused on David
Ray Griffin. We'll call it something like "The
Disbelievers." Mention the Mossad a couple of times in passing
but not the German Intelligence
that says the Mossad organized the whole event (with Bush's
foreknowledge.) The important thing is to emphasize that the
'government' did this. It was an "inside job." Dubya will take the
fall in the public's mind."