- by Dr Charles Kyte III -
(Posted here by Wes Penre, Illuminati News: March 16, 2004)

From : <>
Sent : Monday, March 15, 2004 6:32 PM
To : Charles Kyte <>
Subject : Re: Kidnapping, torture, and electronic surveillance

Dear Sir,

Techniques described in this document has already come to our attention on several occasions in recent times. However; it is not clear if these are disinformation or actual leaks. Maybe should you try to get feasability estimates from third parts.

As you are in MSSM, it should not be difficult to you to find out if the institution you work for is involved or not.



From : <>
Sent : Tuesday, March 16, 2004 4:54 AM
To : Charles Kyte <> Subject : Re: Kidnapping, torture, and electronic surveillance

| | | Brain Implant Research | Inbox

Dear Sir,

We acknowledge the information enclosed in your first mail. It will be transmitted to our adviser in bio-tech sciences for review.

As your personal security might be at risk, it is your interest to transmit the greatest number of technical documents (research analysys memorandums, chips micro-electronic schemas, photographs of experiment subjects, ...) and the names, ranks, employers of involved physical persons.

In the meabtime, you should also take care in preparing safe escape ways (relatives or trustworthy people living abroad ?), should the danger become more precise. Get acquainted with PGP (PGP 2.0 is prefrable if you can get
or equivalent as there is no safe place on the Internet.


Quoting Charles Kyte <>:

>Thank you for your prompt attention. The information below serves as a
>proof/rationale for my claim that these technologies exist. I am
>living proof that individuals are being kidnapped and tortured. I do
>not have any definitive proof as to the agents involved in the torture,
>but a survey of the staff and faculty, especially those involved with
>any intelligence or counter-intelligence agency may yield all the proof
>you need. My goal is to disseminate the information... for fear of my
>Charles Kyte
>Research Coordinator
>Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Research Information:




 3 of 125 DOCUMENTS
Copyright 2003, Inc.
November 11, 2003 Tuesday

SECTION: Feature

LENGTH: 1811 words

HEADLINE: Where is the real Matrix?

BYLINE: By Shy Shoham and Sam Hall

Neural implant devices are now a reality. But misguided federal policies are keeping them from the people who need them.


In the futuristic vision of the Wachowski brothers' movie trilogy "The Matrix," humans dive into a virtual world by connecting their brains directly to a computer. Most movie viewers may consider direct interfaces with the nervous system as much of a fantasy as the movie's gravity-defying special effects.

However, for a small group of engineers and scientists this very idea is very real -- and is driving advances in medical technology that could help millions of disabled people see and hear -- and live normal lives. Unfortunately, bureaucratic hurdles have slowed the development of this technology, and its potential remains largely untapped.

Real-life human-computer interfaces are called neuroprostheses -- medical devices that connect directly to the human brain, spinal cord or nerves.

"Matrix" fans might be surprised to learn that neuroprostheses have been around as long as more "traditional" devices like cardiac pacemakers. In fact, a number of neuroprosthetic devices were already being developed in the 1950s, and by the early 1970s the National Institutes of Health established the Neural Prostheses Program to coordinate research in this promising field.

The first neuroprostheses to become commercially available in the United States were cochlear implants, following their initial FDA approval in 1984.

Sound from a microphone placed near the ear is coverted to weak electrical currents that activate auditory nerve endings inside the cochlea in the inner ear. The activity produced in these nerves propagates directly to the brain, where it produces an auditory perception. By bypassing the normal hearing apparatus it provides an artificial hearing sensation to deaf people. To date, more than 55,000 patients worldwide have received cochlear implants. The technology of cochlear implants has enjoyed remarkable advances since the early days. Improvements in signal processing now allow many deaf users to use these devices to perceive speech, talk on the phone, and even listen to music.

While sensory prostheses like the cochlear implant provide a substitute sensory percept, motor prostheses are used to move muscles -- allowing the paralyzed to regain lost function. One example of a motor prosthesis is the FreeHand system from NeuroControl Corp., which uses implanted muscle stimulators to restore limited hand movement in individuals paralyzed as a result of certain forms of spinal cord injury. The user of this system controls it with a controller-stimulator unit implanted behind his shoulder. Limb-control systems like the FreeHand system have been implanted in more than 300 patients.

The most widely used motor neuroprostheses are devices used to stimulate the bladder in paralyzed individuals who have lost control of bladder voiding.

Thousands of such devices have been implanted worldwide for over three decades.

A very different use of neuroprosthetic devices is to disrupt unwanted brain activity, which can be the result of different neurological diseases. These devices target the tremors that result from Parkinson's disease, essential tremor, seizures that result from epilepsy, and chronic, persistent pain (which has a variety of causes). They are implanted in patients that are not responding to medication. Anti-tremor devices are implanted by neurosurgeons in the patient 's brain, in a region called the basal ganglia. More than 15,000 patients have been implanted with such deep-brain stimulators. Anti-epileptic devices are implanted in the patient's neck region around the vagus nerve. Over 18,000 patients have been implanted with vagus-nerve stimulators to date. Devices for chronic pain have been implanted in a variety of regions, most commonly in the spinal cord. Many science fiction fans will argue that fully immersive virtual interfaces are the future of brain-computer interaction. The technology for such systems does not exist yet, but interestingly, the development of microelectronic technology over the last four decades, which has enabled chip manufacturers to squeeze hundreds of millions of transistors onto a single chip in your PC or cellphone, may also revolutionize the field of neuroprosthetics, allowing a technical leap in that direction.

Several research labs from universities and companies around the world are using microelectronic technology to develop devices known as "microelectrode arrays." These devices can "interact" independently with a large number of nerve cells: recording their activity or stimulating them. The development of microelectrode arrays has allowed researchers in the field to start thinking seriously about a variety of next-generation neuroprosthetic devices, including new types of neuroprostheses. These include vision prostheses for the blind and brain-computer interfaces for the totally paralyzed.

Brain-computer interfaces are arguably the most "futuristic" devices currently being developed. If successful, they will allow paralyzed individuals to use their brain instead of their paralyzed muscles to communicate directly with a computer or control their environment. This may give patients suffering from the extreme "locked-in" syndrome a way to break out of their disease-induced solitude, and may provide quality-of-life benefits to many other individuals whose paralysis is not as complete. As with most other devices, several possible approaches are pursued in the development of brain-computer interfaces. Recording electrodes can be placed noninvasively on the surface of the scalp or implanted surgically into the brain, where they can be used to tap on the brain's inner communications. Both approaches have pros and cons, and it is yet unclear which carries the best long-term potential.

As humans we experience the world through our five senses, and nerves are used to control the muscles that move our body. Many diseases affect nerves, muscles and brain. Clearly, being able to bypass or block defective systems is an important capability -- this is why neuroprosthetics has many possible applications and holds great promise.

But how have these devices fared in the marketplace? Not well. In the entire 1990s only eight implantable neuroprosthetic devices received FDA approval.

Moreover, most of those devices were based not on cutting-edge advances, but on decades-old pacemaker technology.

Why is so little innovation reaching the patient? One basic problem is a mismatch between the hurdles faced by neuroprosthetic devices in finding a profitable market, and the dynamics of the marketplace itself. An analysis of neuroprosthesis commercialization efforts from the last two decades reveals major barriers posed by FDA regulations and even larger barriers posed by device-reimbursement policies that fail to account for long-term economic benefits.

The existing regulatory environment is largely adapted for the drug market, in which large companies and vast markets can shoulder long-term financial risks. However, the same environment has slowed neuroprosthetic commercialization and development to a trickle.

Entrepreneurs in this field typically face a decade of regulatory uncertainty and chronic underpayment for the devices themselves. Many entrepreneurs are willing to shoulder this uncertainty, but the environment makes it difficult to raise the capital necessary for clinical trials and the initial phases of entry into the marketplace. This factor led directly to the discontinuation of the first cochlear implant introduced the United States: the 3M/House implant.

More recently, distribution of the FreeHand system described above has been discontinued following disappointing financial results.

Most neuroprosthetic devices target a relatively small patient population, making them ideal candidates for the FDA's Humanitarian Device Exemption (HDE), which is supposed to waive the costly effort of demonstrating effectiveness.

However, in its present form this exemption imposes a heavy burden on developers and hospitals as well as tight legal limits on device prices. In essence, the restrictions have so far prevented profitable manufacturing of the devices in the United States.

The Vocare system, which restores bladder control to paralyzed individuals and was marketed in the United States by NeuroControl Corp. of Cleveland, Ohio, is an illustrative example. Despite years of availability in Europe, the Vocare system was withdrawn from the U.S. market following two years of disappointing financial results, leaving tens of thousands of paralyzed individuals without an equivalent alternative. This withdrawal is largely attributable to restrictive HDE policies. There are signs that at least some of the inefficiencies in the FDA review process are slowly being eliminated: Removing the HDE caveats would probably prove invaluable to neuroprosthetics as well as to their target users.

The most serious barrier is undoubtedly the reimbursement policy, largely determined in the United States by Medicare. Medicare's prospective-payment system does not contain specific reimbursement codes for neuroprosthetic devices, and they are invariably assigned to nonspecific categories that cover surgical costs but greatly underpay device costs. In fact, of the more than 500 reimbursement codes, only four inpatient categories are specific to implantable devices -- all for cardiac pacemakers.

One may argue that this is a reasonable policy choice for cutting medical expenses, but a number of studies have shown that the long-term financial benefits of devices such as cochlear implants for the deaf, vagus-nerve stimulators for controlling epilepsy, and other neuroprosthetic devices are much greater than the immediate costs associated with device purchase and implantation.

In spite of those studies, Medicare consistently underpays for these breakthrough technologies. Furthermore, the years spent until the actual reimbursement decision is made have already led to the withdrawal of several devices. There is no reason to assume that the fate of future neuroprostheses will be different. Reimbursement adjustments that will allow a more predictable, expeditious and unbiased payment for breakthrough medical devices (possibly by using temporary reimbursement codes) will almost certainly boost innovation in this field.

In his groundbreaking 1984 novel "Neuromancer," where "The Matrix" was born, William Gibson describes a future with vast computer networks accessible through direct human-computer interfaces. Gibson's "cyberspace" has become an everyday reality in the World Wide Web, but the development of direct neural interfaces is still a disappointment. Simple policy adjustments can change this trend, allowing these useful devices, many of which can already be manufactured, to set the stage for major improvements in this branch of medical technology.

LOAD-DATE: November 12, 2003

Electronic Surveillance System Follows Millions Of People
- by Dr. Charles Kyte -
(Also Posted here by Wes Penre, Illuminati News: March 2, 2004)

I received the following letter from Dr. Charles Kyte and found it very interesting. I decided to publish it as-is, so I can let Dr. Kyte take care of the introduction.

Sincerely Yours,
Wes Penre

I am a research scientist based out of the Mount Sinai School of Medicine.  I was informally made aware of illegal neurological-psychological ops and experiments (biotelemetry)(1) conducted at major universities (Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Smith College, DownState Medical Center, University of Southern California, etc)  and cities (New York City, Boston).  Are you familiar with this technology?(2) See below.

Charles Kyte
[Son of a Deceased World Order of St. Johns Knights of Malta
(3) (Australia): CWolde Kyte, MD (MA), PhD,
Knight Commander of North & South America]

* * *


World's first brain prosthesis revealed
19:00 12 March 03
Exclusive from New Scientist Print Edition.
The world's first brain prosthesis - an artificial hippocampus - is about to be tested in California. Unlike devices like cochlear implants, which merely stimulate brain activity, this silicon chip implant will perform the same processes as the damaged part of the brain it is replacing. [University of Southern California, Los Angeles] 
Keywords: radio implants, microchips, brain, bioelectrical resonance,  DNA microchip



Every thought, reaction, hearing and visual observation causes a certain neurological potential, spikes, and patterns in the brain and its electromagnetic fields, which can now be decoded into thoughts, pictures and voices. Electromagnetic stimulation can therefore change a person's brainwaves and affect muscular activity, causing painful muscular cramps experienced as torture.
The NSA's electronic surveillance system can simultaneously follow and handle millions of people. Each of us has a unique bioelectrical resonance frequency in the brain, just like we have unique fingerprints. With electro-magnetic frequency (EMF) brain stimulation fully coded, pulsating electromagnetic signals can be sent to the brain, causing the desired voice and visual effects to be experienced by the target. This is a form of electronic warfare. U.S. astronauts were implanted before they were sent into space so their thoughts could be followed and all their emotions could be registered 24 hours a day.
The NSA's Signals Intelligence can remotely monitor information from human brains by decoding the evoked potentials (3.50HZ, 5 milliwatt) emitted by the brain. Prisoner experimentees in both Gothenburg, Sweden and Vienna, Austria have been found to have [missing word] brain lesions. Diminished blood circulation and lack of oxygen in the right temporal frontal lobes result where brain implants are usually operative. A Finnish experimentee experienced brain atrophy and intermittent attacks of unconsciousness due to lack of oxygen.
Mind control techniques can be used for political purposes. The goal of mind controllers today is to induce the targeted persons or groups to act against his or her own convictions and best interests. Zombified individuals can even be programmed to murder and remember nothing of their crime afterward. Alarming examples of this phenomenon can be found in the U.S.

By Dr. Rauni Leena Kilde, MD
September 25, 1999
Helsingin Sanomat, the largest newspaper in Scandinavia, wrote in the September 9, 1999 issue that Scientific American magazine estimates that after the Millenium [sic] perhaps ALL people will be implanted with a "DNA microchip".
How many people realize what it actually means? Total loss of privacy and total outside control of the person's physical body functions, mental, emotional and thought processes, including the implanted person's subconscious and dreams! For the rest of his life!
It sounds like science fiction but it is secret military and intelligence agencies' mind control technology, which has been experimented with for almost half a century. Totally without the knowledge of the general public and even the general academic population.
Supercomputers in Maryland, Israel and elsewhere with a speed of over 20 BILLION bits/sec can monitor millions of people simultaneously. In fact, the whole world population can be totally controlled by these secret brain-computer interactions, however unbelievable it sounds for the uninformed.
Human thought has a speed of 5,000 bits/sec and everyone understands that our brain cannot compete with supercomputers acting via satellites, implants, local facilities, scalar or other forms of biotelemetry.
Each brain has a unique set of bioelectric resonance/entrainment characteristics. Remote neural monitoring systems with supercomputers can send messages through an implanted person's nervous system and affect their performance in any way desired. They can of course be tracked and identified anywhere.
Neuro-electromagnetic involuntary human experimentation has been going on with the so-called "vulnerable population" for about 50 years, in the name of "science" or "national security" in the worst Nazi-type testing, contrary to all human rights. Physical and psychological torture of mind control victims today is like the worst horror movies. Only, unlike the horror movies, it is true.
It happens today in the USA, Japan, and Europe. With few exceptions, the mass media suppresses all information about the entire topic.
Mind control technology in the USA is classified under "non-lethal" weaponry. The name is totally misleading because the technology used IS lethal, but death comes slowly in the form of "normal" illnesses, like cancer, leukemia, heart attacks, Alzheimer's disease with loss of short term memory first. No wonder these illnesses have increased all over the world.
When the use of electromagnetic fields, extra-low (ELF) and ultra-low (ULF) frequencies and microwaves aimed deliberately at certain individuals, groups, and even the general population to cause diseases, disorientation, chaos and physical and emotional pain breaks into the awareness of the general population, a public outcry is inevitable.
[Eleanor White comment: ELF/ULF frequencies on their own cannot be focused and are practically impossible to transmit in the usual manner of radio transmissions. ELF/ULF cannot carry voice.
ELF/ULF CAN be carried on radio and ultrasound carrier signals, however, and are effective in things like setting up a target to be more receptive to hypnosis, force a target to be unable to sleep, and force a target to fall asleep daytime. This is like the reverse process of reading the brain's natural ELF/ULF electrical activity using biofeedback.]
Recommended reading: Mind Controllers, Dr. Armen Victorian, 1999, UK Mind Control, World Control, Jim Keith, 1997, USA Microwave Mind Control, Tim Rifat, The Truth Campaign, winter 1998, UK

Charles L. Kyte, III
The Mount Sinai School of Medicine
One Gustave Levy Place, Box 1124
New York, NY 10029
(212) 241-9386

Mount Sinai School of Medicine, NY


(1) Biotelemerty homepage:
(2) Dr. Kyte has first hand knowledge of these operations, according to a letter he wrote to me on March 1, 2004. Wes Penre.
(3) The Knights of Malta Home Page

Updated/Revised: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 13:45:41 -0800



|| Home | Current Updates | The U.S. Constitution | The Shadow Government a.k.a. the Illuminati | Secret Societies | The New World Order | Occultism | Banking & Paper Money | Politics | Business | Technology | Media Control | Government & Mind Control | Microchipping | Drugs | Nazism Today & In The Past | The War on Terrorism | Religions & Religious Wars | Wars Towards a New World Order | U.S. Patents to Control Us | Surveillance | Health | Miscellaneous | Articles by Wes Penre | E-Books for Free | Links to Other WebsitesCopyright Fair Use | Resources & Bibliography |Site Search | E-Mail Us ||