Key war on terror architect Douglas Feith
has now confirmed Donald Rumsfeld, Paul
Wolfowitz and Wesley Clark in admitting that the
so-called War on Terror is a hoax.
In fact, starting right after 9/11 -- at the
latest -- the goal has always been to create
"regime change" and instability in Iraq, Iran,
Syria, Libya, Sudan, Somalia and Lebanon so as
to protect Israel. And the goal was never really
to destroy Al Qaeda.
Three weeks after
the September 11, 2001, terror attacks,
former US defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld
established an official military objective
of not only removing the Saddam Hussein
regime by force but overturning the regime
in Iran, as well as in Syria and four other
countries in the Middle East, according to a
document quoted extensively in then-under
secretary of defense for policy Douglas
Feith's recently published account of the
Iraq war decisions. Feith's account further
indicates that this aggressive aim of
remaking the map of the Middle East by
military force and the threat of force was
supported explicitly by the country's top
military leaders.
Feith's book, War and Decision,
released last month, provides excerpts of
the paper Rumsfeld sent to President George
W Bush on September 30, 2001, calling for
the administration to focus not on taking
down Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda network but
on the aim of establishing "new regimes" in
a series of states...
***
General Wesley
Clark, who commanded the North Atlantic
Treaty Organization bombing campaign in the
Kosovo war, recalls in his 2003 book
Winning Modern Wars being told by a
friend in the Pentagon in November 2001 that
the list of states that Rumsfeld and deputy
secretary of defense Paul Wolfowitz wanted
to take down included Iraq, Iran, Syria,
Libya, Sudan and Somalia [and Lebanon].
***
When this writer
asked Feith . . . which of the six regimes
on the Clark list were included in the
Rumsfeld paper, he replied, "All of them."
***
The Defense
Department guidance document made it clear
that US military aims in regard to those
states would go well beyond any ties to
terrorism. The document said the Defense
Department would also seek to isolate and
weaken those states and to "disrupt, damage
or destroy" their military capacities - not
necessarily limited to weapons of mass
destruction (WMD).
Where does Israel come in?
Well, the Asia Times article continues:
Rumsfeld's paper
was given to the White House only two weeks
after Bush had approved a US military
operation in Afghanistan directed against
bin Laden and the Taliban regime. Despite
that decision, Rumsfeld's proposal called
explicitly for postponing indefinitely US
airstrikes and the use of ground forces in
support of the anti-Taliban Northern
Alliance in order to try to catch bin Laden.
Instead, the Rumsfeld
paper argued that the US should target
states that had supported anti-Israel forces
such as Hezbollah and Hamas.
*** After the bombing
of two US embassies in East Africa [in 1988]
by al-Qaeda operatives, State Department
counter-terrorism official Michael Sheehan
proposed supporting the anti-Taliban
Northern Alliance in Afghanistan against bin
Laden's sponsor, the Taliban regime.
However, senior US military leaders "refused
to consider it", according to a 2004 account
by Richard H Shultz, Junior, a military
specialist at Tufts University.
A senior officer on the Joint Staff
told State Department counter-terrorism
director Sheehan he
had heard terrorist strikes characterized
more than once by colleagues as a "small
price to pay for being a superpower".
And if "terrorist strikes" were a "small price
to pay for being a superpower"- and that is the
reason that the U.S. government refused to
disrupt the alleged planners of the 9/11 attacks
- doesn't that add weight to the
claim that the U.S. government intentionally
allowed the 9/11 attacks to occur? In other
words, doesn't this statement by a senior
officer of the Joint Chiefs of Staff tend to
prove that 9/11 was intentionally allowed to
occur as the "New Pearl Harbor" which would
allow America to act like "a superpower" and
re-make the Middle East in its own (and
Israel's) image?
This is not an unreasonable question, especially
given that Feith, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz and most
of the other key architects of the "war on
terror" were part of the Project for a New
American Century and its plea for a "New Pearl
Harbor" to justify expansion of American
militarism and regime change in the Middle East.
And remember that many of the key members of
PNAC and architects of the "war on terror" had
previously created the
"Clean Break" strategy for Israel, which
called for a policy of war and regime change
against Israel's enemies.
The war on terror was never intended to be about
fighting terrorism. As even
Newsweek has now admitted, the war on terror
is a hoax.
Make a comment and have it posted here!
Write me an email and put the same title in
your email subject line as the title of the
article you want to comment on. Wes Penre.
Wes Penre is a
researcher, journalist, the owner of the domains
Illuminati News
and
Zionist Watch and is the publisher of the
same. He has been researching Globalization and the New World
Order and exposed the big players behind the scenes for more
than a decade now. He has published his research on the Internet
at the above domains, which are currently updated to keep people
informed what is going on. You can also find his articles linked
up, discussed and republished all over the Internet.
This
page may contain copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material
available in my efforts to advance understanding of environmental,
political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice
issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted
material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In
accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is
distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in
receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
.jpg)
