~ Illuminati News ~

 
  Home
 
  Site Map
 
  Read First!!!
 
  News & Updates
 
  US Constitution
 
  The Illuminati
 
  Secret Societies
 
  New World Order
 
  Occultism
 
  Banking & Paper Money
 
  Politics
 
  Business
 
  Technology & Science
 
  Media Control
 
  UFOs & Aliens
 
  Mind Control
 
  Art & Mind Control
 
  Microchipping
 
  Drugs
 
  War on Terrorism
 
 

Manmade and Natural Disasters
 

 

Religions & Religious Wars
 

  Wars Towards a New World Order
 
  Government Patents To Control Us
 
  Surveillance
 
  Health
 
  Miscellaneous
 
  Solutions
 
  Spiritual Solutions
 
  Articles by Wes Penre
 
  Guest  Writers
 
  Archives
 
  FAQ
 
  Video & Audio Room
 
  E-Books
 
  Website on CD-ROM
 
  Links
 
  Bibliography
 
  Copyright Fair Use
 
  Disclaimer
 
  Site Search
 
  Donations
 
  Contact Webmaster
 

Last Updated:
Wednesday, January 10, 2007 04:23:53 AM

Wednesday, January 10, 2007

Lords Consider Mental Health Laws 
BBC News , Jan 08, 2007

Last Updated: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 04:23:53 AM

 


Nazi eugenics revisited...Wes Penre, www.illuminati-news.com 

The changes have been criticised by doctors and campaigners

 

he House of Lords is carrying out a detailed consideration of proposals to introduce new mental health laws.

The new government bill would allow the enforced detention of people who are mentally ill, even if they have not committed any crime.

It also suggests strengthening powers established in 1983 to ensure patients have therapy once they are released back into the community.

Critics of the bill say it would fail to safeguard the rights of patients.

Health Minister Rosie Winterton said the bill would reflect changes to mental health services in recent years.

"We have made it very clear in the bill that appropriate treatment has to be available for detention to take place," she said.

Ensure medication

Current laws do not allow people with severe personality disorders who have committed no offence to be detained.

The government wants to give the right to force patients who have been released into the community to take their medication, even if they do not want to.

It also wants to allow the detention of people with personality orders who are described as untreatable, even if they have not committed a crime.

I think the idea that somehow this bill is going to prevent homicides and violent assaults is a mistake.

Professor Sheila Hollins
Royal College of Psychiatrists

 

Doctors and campaigners argue the bill erodes the rights of patients without making the public any safer.

An amendment to ensure a set of guiding principles protecting patients' rights was debated.

Broadcaster and writer Lord Bragg, who takes the Labour whip, said this was of "crucial importance."

Treatments

He said: "People should retain as much autonomy as possible. People may have decision-making ability over many of the areas where decisions need to be made.

"It may be necessary for someone to receive treatment under compulsory powers, but they may have views and knowledge about which treatments have previously helped or harmed them."

He added: "People should be supported to make their own decisions where possible and given the same choices as people with physical health conditions."

The bill was promised in the Queen's Speech and comes after previous attempts to change the act were thwarted by opposition from campaigners and doctors.

The government published a draft Mental Health Bill in 2002, but dropped it last March.

Instead of replacing the old laws, the latest bill proposes amending the existing Mental Health Act from 1983.

Health Minister Lord Hunt said the proposed amendment was not appropriate in a bill that sought not to re-write the law completely but merely to amend the old act.

Conservative Lord Howe, who did not put his amendment to a vote, said: "I urge the government to be bold, to use this opportunity to put the legislation into a context of values and, in so doing, to make a real difference to mental health patients."

About 50 Labour MPs have already signalled their intention to oppose the bill, which would apply to England and Wales.

The changes would affect about 14,000 of the 600,000 people who use mental health services each year.

The desire to change the law was largely driven by Michael Stone's 1998 conviction for the murders of Lin and Megan Russell.

 

Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/6239939.stm
 


This page may contain copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material available in my efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
 


- - - - - - - -
Disclaimer
- - - - - - - -
 


 


Design downloaded from FreeWebTemplates.com
Free web design, web templates, web layouts, and website resources!